Nicolas Torre Relief from PNP Chief Post: Ping Lacson Explains Why
The abrupt removal of Police General Nicolas Deloso Torre III as Chief of the Philippine National Police (PNP) triggered national conversations. Trusted for his integrity and notable service, Torreโs relief raised eyebrowsโespecially given his short 85-day tenure. Former senator and ex-PNP Chief Panfilo โPingโ Lacson recently provided insight, pointing not to misconduct, but to issues of institutional jurisdiction, procedural misalignment, and democratic governance.

Why Nicolas Torreโs Relief Sparked Public Attention
Nicolas Torre assumed the PNP chief role on June 2, 2025โbecoming the first Philippine National Police Academy (PNPA) graduate to lead the force. His leadership ended abruptly on August 25, 2025, when President Marcos, via Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, signed his relief order effective immediately.
The brevity of his termโand his participation in high-profile operations such as the arrest of former President Duterte and imposing a five-minute emergency response policyโmade his removal especially surprising.
Ping Lacsonโs Stand on Nicolas Torreโs Relief
Ping Lacson clarified that Torreโs relief wasnโt a reflection of ethical failings. Instead, it was a matter of institutional propriety, particularly regarding police reassignments and authority limits.
Institutional Jurisdiction and Procedural Integrity
On August 14, the National Police Commission (Napolcom) issued a directive for Torre to reinstate his deputy, Lt. Gen. Jose Melencio Nartatez Jr., and to revise the reassignment of 12 other officials. Arroyo-backed PNP reshuffling that conflicted with this directive became a critical issue, drawing the attention of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).
Lacson emphasized that Torreโs actionsโwhile not criminalโdisregarded the Napolcomโs authority and blurred the line between PNP autonomy and regulatory oversight.
Balancing Authority with Neutrality
Lacson highlighted the need for leaders to act in ways that preserve the neutrality of the PNP. Despite Torreโs strong record, any semblance of overreach could undermine public confidence in the institution. His relief, therefore, served as a corrective measure to reaffirm the independence of oversight systems.
What Happened Next: Nartatez Steps In
Following Torreโs removal, Lt. Gen. Jose Melencio Nartatez Jr. was appointed as Officer-in-Charge of the PNP. His reinstatement aligned with Napolcomโs directive and underscored the commissionโs decisive role in PNP appointments.
The reshuffle was thus seen as not just a personnel change but a reaffirmation of proper procedure and institutional balance.
The Broader Implications of Nicolas Torreโs Relief
Upholding Checks and Balances
Torreโs short stint as PNP chief โ the briefest in the institutionโs history โ illustrates a broader principle: administrative structures must endure beyond individual personalities. Even a widely respected leader must yield to procedural norms.
A Test of Institutional Resilience
The case reinforces the importance of transparency, independent oversight, and leadership accountability. Torreโs relief highlights how institutions like the Napolcom and DILG serve as checks to ensure that change isnโt arbitrary, but rooted in legitimate process.
FAQs about Nicolas Torreโs Relief
Source References
- Torreโs career overview and short tenure, including Napolcom conflict context. Wikipedia
- Napolcomโs directive requiring reinstatement of Nartatez and revision of transfers. Inquirer.net
- DILG affirmation that the PNP reshuffle was a factor in Torreโs removal. ABS-CBN
- Appointment of Nartatez as Officer-in-Charge.
About the Author

A blogger with 3 years of experience in the online gaming niche specializes in creating detailed casino guides that help players make informed choices. They share practical tips, game strategies, and unbiased reviews drawn from hands-on research and testing. Remaining behind the scenes, they prioritize delivering trustworthy and engaging content to readers worldwide.