Nicolas Torre Relief from PNP Chief Post: Ping Lacson Explains Why

The abrupt removal of Police General Nicolas Deloso Torre III as Chief of the Philippine National Police (PNP) triggered national conversations. Trusted for his integrity and notable service, Torreโ€™s relief raised eyebrowsโ€”especially given his short 85-day tenure. Former senator and ex-PNP Chief Panfilo โ€œPingโ€ Lacson recently provided insight, pointing not to misconduct, but to issues of institutional jurisdiction, procedural misalignment, and democratic governance.

torre boxing win


Why Nicolas Torreโ€™s Relief Sparked Public Attention

Nicolas Torre assumed the PNP chief role on June 2, 2025โ€”becoming the first Philippine National Police Academy (PNPA) graduate to lead the force. His leadership ended abruptly on August 25, 2025, when President Marcos, via Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin, signed his relief order effective immediately.

The brevity of his termโ€”and his participation in high-profile operations such as the arrest of former President Duterte and imposing a five-minute emergency response policyโ€”made his removal especially surprising.


Ping Lacsonโ€™s Stand on Nicolas Torreโ€™s Relief

Ping Lacson clarified that Torreโ€™s relief wasnโ€™t a reflection of ethical failings. Instead, it was a matter of institutional propriety, particularly regarding police reassignments and authority limits.

Institutional Jurisdiction and Procedural Integrity

On August 14, the National Police Commission (Napolcom) issued a directive for Torre to reinstate his deputy, Lt. Gen. Jose Melencio Nartatez Jr., and to revise the reassignment of 12 other officials. Arroyo-backed PNP reshuffling that conflicted with this directive became a critical issue, drawing the attention of the Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG).

Lacson emphasized that Torreโ€™s actionsโ€”while not criminalโ€”disregarded the Napolcomโ€™s authority and blurred the line between PNP autonomy and regulatory oversight.

Balancing Authority with Neutrality

Lacson highlighted the need for leaders to act in ways that preserve the neutrality of the PNP. Despite Torreโ€™s strong record, any semblance of overreach could undermine public confidence in the institution. His relief, therefore, served as a corrective measure to reaffirm the independence of oversight systems.


What Happened Next: Nartatez Steps In

Following Torreโ€™s removal, Lt. Gen. Jose Melencio Nartatez Jr. was appointed as Officer-in-Charge of the PNP. His reinstatement aligned with Napolcomโ€™s directive and underscored the commissionโ€™s decisive role in PNP appointments.

The reshuffle was thus seen as not just a personnel change but a reaffirmation of proper procedure and institutional balance.


The Broader Implications of Nicolas Torreโ€™s Relief

Upholding Checks and Balances

Torreโ€™s short stint as PNP chief โ€“ the briefest in the institutionโ€™s history โ€“ illustrates a broader principle: administrative structures must endure beyond individual personalities. Even a widely respected leader must yield to procedural norms.

A Test of Institutional Resilience

The case reinforces the importance of transparency, independent oversight, and leadership accountability. Torreโ€™s relief highlights how institutions like the Napolcom and DILG serve as checks to ensure that change isnโ€™t arbitrary, but rooted in legitimate process.


FAQs about Nicolas Torreโ€™s Relief


Source References

  • Torreโ€™s career overview and short tenure, including Napolcom conflict context. Wikipedia
  • Napolcomโ€™s directive requiring reinstatement of Nartatez and revision of transfers. Inquirer.net
  • DILG affirmation that the PNP reshuffle was a factor in Torreโ€™s removal. ABS-CBN
  • Appointment of Nartatez as Officer-in-Charge.

About the Author

Scroll to Top